Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 796189

Summary: ERROR jbpm.console.directory property not found
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: Zuzana Krejčová <zkrejcov>
Component: jBPM ConsoleAssignee: Kris Verlaenen <kverlaen>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: BRMS 5.3.0.GA   
Target Milestone: ER7   
Target Release: BRMS 5.3.0.GA   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-10 03:19:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Zuzana Krejčová 2012-02-22 12:58:48 UTC 
Description of problem:
Clicking Process Overview results in 
ERROR [StatefulKnowledgeSessionUtil] jbpm.console.directory property not found 
being logged into the server log.

It happens every time, but seemingly doesn't have effect on jbpm-console functionality.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
BRMS 5.3.0 ER4


Additional info:
As far as I know, the jbpm.console.directory property was used in the demo installation to tell the console where to look for processes, images... We test with processes from Guvnor's defaultPackage, so we don't use the property. The error should not be logged, or at least not as an error.
Comment 1 Kris Verlaenen 2012-02-28 23:39:41 UTC 
Agreed, this should simply be logged, but not as an error.
Comment 3 Ryan Zhang 2012-04-23 07:36:49 UTC 
Update status to ON_QA. Please verify them against ER6.
Comment 5 Zuzana Krejčová 2012-05-02 13:55:29 UTC 
Sorry for the confusion, found it again. This time, I get:
ERROR [GraphViewerPluginImpl] jbpm.console.directory property not found

Still error, this time only from GraphViewerPluginImpl.
Could you please look at it again?
Comment 6 Maciej Swiderski 2012-05-02 14:55:40 UTC 
already fixed as part of BZ-813412 but seems like it was not picked up by the ER6 build.
Comment 7 Ryan Zhang 2012-05-14 08:16:29 UTC 
The fixed for this issue should be included in ER7. Please do verification on it.
Comment 15 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-02-10 03:19:06 UTC 
This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla.