Bug 796291

Summary: reposync man page different for command line help
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Mohammed Arafa <bugzilla>
Component: yum-utilsAssignee: James Antill <james.antill>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7CC: pschiffe, tcallawa, zpavlas
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ManPageChange
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-10 20:49:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mohammed Arafa 2012-02-22 16:06:21 UTC
Description of problem:
the man page for reposync is different from the command line help for reposync
man page has less parameters

what is see missing are:
  -e CACHEDIR, --cachedir=CACHEDIR
  -d, --delete          delete local packages no longer present in repository
                        directory in which to store metadata
  -l, --plugins         enable yum plugin support
  -m, --downloadcomps   also download comps.xml

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.1.16-16.el5

How reproducible:
everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1.compare reposync --help to man reposync
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
difference

Expected results:
all switches mirrored in the man

Additional info:

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2013-05-01 07:20:34 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 James Antill 2013-12-10 20:49:39 UTC
 Given the age of this and how it's a cosmetic problem I'm going to close this now, as we are very late in RHEL-5. At least the early versions of RHEL-6 yum/yum-utils could be rebuilt on RHEL-5, so if any customer really needs this then that is a viable path.