Bug 796331
Summary: | SELinux prevents clustered qpidd (qpidd_t) from name_connect (tcp_socket, amqp_port_t) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel> |
Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Milos Malik <mmalik> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | dwalsh, ebenes, freznice, iboverma, jpallich, mgrepl, mmalik, msvoboda, pm-eus |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
An incorrect SELinux policy prevented the qpidd service from connecting to the AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) port when the qpidd daemon was configured with Corosync clustering. These selinux-policy packages contain updated SELinux rules, which allow the qpidd service to be started correctly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-03-07 12:45:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 791294 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
RHEL Program Management
2012-02-22 17:20:18 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10 Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: An incorrect SELinux policy prevented the qpidd service from connecting to the AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) port when the qpidd daemon was configured with Corosync clustering. These selinux-policy packages contain updated SELinux rules, which allow the qpidd service to be started correctly. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0364.html |