| Summary: | lldpad: DCBX: segfault may occur when clearing advertise bit | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | john.r.fastabend |
| Component: | lldpad | Assignee: | Petr Šabata <psabata> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | asersen, azelinka, john.r.fastabend, john.ronciak, kavindya.s.deegala, robert.w.love, swadeley |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | lldpad-0.9.43-14.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
No documentation needed.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 14:14:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
john.r.fastabend
2012-02-23 18:49:37 UTC
Intel observed this defect in RHEL6.2. We're a bit unclear as to whether this meets the 6.2 errata critera to get this patch backported. It's certainly a bad problem (segfault), but it's user space. At this point I just wanted to make RH aware that the failure exists in RHEL6.2. Pushed as lldpad-0.9.43-14.el6. Verification failed with Red Hat 6.3 Alpha Please ignore Comment 8. Verification passed with Red hat 6.3 Alpha.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
No documentation needed.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0901.html |