| Summary: | netatalk : Conflicts with jday | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> |
| Component: | netatalk | Assignee: | Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | aglotov, huzaifas, zonexpertconsulting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened, Tracking |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-10-31 00:57:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle. Changing version to '19'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19 This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Adding jday owner here. Can jday be retired? It has a dead upstream for years. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. I am going to close out this bug, originally reported in 2012. While I agree the conflict with /usr/bin/dbd is an issue, I can see no simple fix for this that can be made on the netatalk side. If anyone disagrees, feel free to reopen this with a patch or detailed solution to the problem. The following the guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/ FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5 Is that with or without contacting the FPC? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_other_uses_of_conflicts netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5 netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
=> netatalk-2.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm => 4:netatalk-2.2.2-1.fc17.i686 in fedora-development-i386 File conflict with: jday-2.4-7.fc17.i686 /usr/bin/dbd [semi-automated bug report]