Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 798459

Summary: No way to tell which subscription is what when using activation keys
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: scollier
Component: Content ManagementAssignee: Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.1CC: mmccune, scollier, sreichar
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-03-18 17:36:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot of issue. none

Description scollier 2012-02-28 22:29:01 UTC
Description of problem:

I'm trying to create an activation key and assign the RHEL 6.2 channel to my instances with that key.  The problem is that when I go to create a new key and add a subscription, i get 18 "Red Hat Employee Subscription" subscriptions with no description of what they are.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

CloudForms System Engine Version: 0.1.238-4.el6 
# /pub/scripts/post_install_configuration_scripts/cf-se-versions 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago)
Linux cf-se4.cloud.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 6 16:39:28 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
PyYAML-3.09-14.el6_1.x86_64
facter-1.5.9-1.el6.noarch
js-1.8.5-6.el6.x86_64
mongodb-1.8.2-3.el6.x86_64
mongodb-server-1.8.2-3.el6.x86_64
puppet-2.6.11-1.el6_1.noarch
pymongo-1.9-8.el6_1.x86_64
tomcat6-6.0.24-35.el6_1.noarch
ruby-1.8.7.352-5.el6_2.x86_64
grinder-0.0.136-1.el6.noarch
postgresql-server-8.4.9-1.el6_1.1.x86_64
postgresql-8.4.9-1.el6_1.1.x86_64
candlepin-0.5.20-1.el6.noarch
pulp-0.0.265-1.el6.noarch
katello-0.1.238-4.el6.noarch
katello-all-0.1.238-4.el6.noarch
katello-cli-0.1.54-2.el6.noarch
katello-configure-0.1.64-5.el6.noarch


How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. I generated a manifest at access.redhat.com/management and uploaded that to my system engine server
2. synchronized the 6Server x86_64 and 32bit repos
3. synchronized a couple of custom repos (those seem to work fine)
4. create a anew key, give it a name, associate it with a system template, save
5. click on "available subscriptions"
6. expand "Red Hat Employee Subscription (18 Types)"
7. all the subs are the same name, only differentiation is virtual or physical.
  
Actual results:

get same names

Expected results:

some descriptive name so i can tell what's what

Additional info:

Comment 1 scollier 2012-02-28 22:29:44 UTC
Created attachment 566408 [details]
screenshot of issue.

Comment 2 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:00:44 UTC
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist

Comment 3 Mike McCune 2014-03-18 17:36:51 UTC
This bug was closed because of a lack of activity.  If you feel this bug should be reconsidered for attention please feel free to re-open the bug with a comment stating why it should be reconsidered.