Bug 799764

Summary: [tech review] Document BPMN 2.0 Elements supported in BRMS 5.3
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5 Reporter: lcarlon <lcarlon>
Component: doc-BRMS_Business_Process_Management_GuideAssignee: lcarlon <lcarlon>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Radovan Synek <rsynek>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-25 02:52:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline: 2012-04-20   

Description lcarlon 2012-03-05 00:12:57 UTC
Provide details of the BPMN 2.0 elements supported in BRMS 5.3

Comment 2 lcarlon 2012-03-05 00:15:58 UTC
QE please review the chapter for technical accuracy.

Thanks
Lee

Comment 3 Radovan Synek 2012-04-16 12:51:27 UTC
"Processes can be defined with the BPMN 2.0 specification either by using the designer included in the BRMS user interface, for more details see Chapter 5, First Draft Complete Process Designer, or by manually writing the XML directly."

Actually, this is not right because there is Eclipse plugin which enables drawing process definitions:
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.2/userguide/ch01.html#d0e128

This plugin is also part of JBoss Developer Studio (described in Chapter 6)

Comment 6 lcarlon 2012-05-31 00:26:53 UTC
Hi Radek,

Some of the listed issues have been resolved, I'll only comment on the ones that are still of concern: 

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813183

I've removed details of TimerDelay from the process overview chapter

I've added release notes for the following issues:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812006
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808070
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807640
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807187
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757185

Thanks Radek
Lee

Comment 7 lcarlon 2012-06-25 02:52:38 UTC
Closing as status already set to verified.