Bug 800475
Summary: | redhat-logos rpm contains icons/Fedora directory | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Vladimir Benes <vbenes> |
Component: | redhat-logos | Assignee: | Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | msimon, pvine, rstrode |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | redhat-logos-69.1.0-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-13 11:58:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 800451 |
Description
Vladimir Benes
2012-03-06 14:26:05 UTC
apparently only anaconda.png is in it, and that's the wrong place for it to be (3rd party icons are supposed to go into hicolor), so i'll move it. Verified with redhat-logos-69.1.14-1.el7.noarch. No such directory like /usr/share/icons/Fedora in redhat-logos package. According to that, I'm OK with switching this to verified. But after executing command `rpm -ql redhat-logos | grep [fF]edora` I get this output: /usr/share/firstboot/themes/fedora-verne /usr/share/firstboot/themes/fedora-verne/firstboot-left.png /usr/share/firstboot/themes/fedora-verne/workstation.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/36x36/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/96x96/apps/fedora-logo-icon.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/22x22/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/24x24/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/256x256/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/32x32/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/36x36/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/48x48/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/icons/oxygen/96x96/places/start-here-kde-fedora.png /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-gdm-logo.png /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-small.png /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-sprite.png /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo-sprite.svg /usr/share/pixmaps/fedora-logo.png /usr/share/redhat-logos/fedora_logo.svg /usr/share/redhat-logos/fedora_logo_darkbackground.svg Could you tell me if these could there, or should I file another bug, or switch this one back to assigned, or ..? Thanks I don't want to rename those icons this late in the game, because i'm not sure what things depend on the "fedora" part of the name. It's no secret that rhel is based on fedora, so I don't really see this as a problem, anyway (or a rather minor one). I think we're safe to move this to VERIFIED. Ok then, switching to verified. This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0. Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request. |