Bug 801439
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-netrc - Library to read and write netrc files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bkabrda, notting, package-review, tdawson |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | bkabrda:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-03-21 18:50:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vít Ondruch
2012-03-08 14:33:51 UTC
I'll take this one. - rpmlint shows this error: "rubygem-netrc-doc.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/gems/gems/netrc-0.7/data/sample.netrc 0600L", I believe that the right permissions should be 644. - Otherwise the package looks fine, but we will have to wait for the author to state the license before it gets approved. (In reply to comment #2) > - rpmlint shows this error: "rubygem-netrc-doc.noarch: E: non-readable > /usr/share/gems/gems/netrc-0.7/data/sample.netrc 0600L", I believe that the > right permissions should be 644. Actually I am aware of the report and I believe it is false positive. There are two files in the data directory, the sample.netrc and permissive.netrc. The only difference between these two are the rights. Since "permissive" has more relaxed rights then the sample.netrc, I believe that the permissions are correct and the rpmlint error is false positive. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - rpmlint shows this error: "rubygem-netrc-doc.noarch: E: non-readable > > /usr/share/gems/gems/netrc-0.7/data/sample.netrc 0600L", I believe that the > > right permissions should be 644. > > Actually I am aware of the report and I believe it is false positive. There are > two files in the data directory, the sample.netrc and permissive.netrc. The > only difference between these two are the rights. Since "permissive" has more > relaxed rights then the sample.netrc, I believe that the permissions are > correct and the rpmlint error is false positive. Ah, I see, that makes sense. This package is therefore APPROVED (but please wait for the license clarification). Thank you for your review. I will not build it before the license is clarified. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-netrc Short Description: Library to read and write netrc files Owners: vondruch bkabrda Branches: InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-netrc New Branches: f17 Owners: vondruch bkabrda Git done (by process-git-requests). rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17 Package rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3884/rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). rubygem-netrc-0.7.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-netrc New Branches: epel7 Owners: tdawson Git done (by process-git-requests). |