Bug 801866

Summary:	Unable to share catalog entries between catalogs of different clouds
Product:	[Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine	Reporter:	Steve Reichard <sreichar>
Component:	aeolus-conductor	Assignee:	Angus Thomas <athomas>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.0.0	CC:	akarol, deltacloud-maint, hbrock, jliberma, scollier, ssachdev
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-03-09 18:30:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve Reichard 2012-03-09 17:13:25 UTC

Description of problem:


In beta1 I confirmed I was able to share catalog entries between catalogs both in the same cloud and in different clouds.

In beta3, I can share in the same cloud but not accross different clouds.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):



[root@cf-cloudforms5 imagefactory]# /pub/scripts/post_install_configuration_scripts/cf-versions 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.2 (Santiago)
Linux cf-cloudforms5.cloud.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 6 16:39:28 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
postgresql-8.4.9-1.el6_1.1.x86_64
mongodb-1.8.2-3.el6.x86_64
euca2ools-1.3.1-4.el6_0.noarch
ruby-1.8.7.352-6.el6.x86_64
rubygems-1.8.16-1.el6.noarch
deltacloud-core-0.5.0-5.el6.noarch
rubygem-deltacloud-client-0.5.0-2.el6.noarch
package libdeltacloud is not installed
hail-0.8-0.2.gf9c5b967.el6_0.x86_64
puppet-2.6.11-1.el6_1.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-16.el6.noarch
iwhd-1.2-3.el6.x86_64
imagefactory-1.0.0rc8-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch
[root@cf-cloudforms5 imagefactory]# 




How reproducible:

easily, in Blueprint web page

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Hugh Brock 2012-03-09 18:30:42 UTC

This is actually the intended functionality. Images are intended to be confined to a single CE Cloud, and app blueprints reference those images directly and so must also be confined to a single CE Cloud.

In the future we may add a level of indirection to allow an app blueprint to reference images in multiple CE clouds -- but this is dependent on a whole lot of requirements and design work.