Bug 80311

Summary: Older version of squirrelmail
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Indrajit Raychaudhuri <irc>
Component: squirrelmailAssignee: Gary Benson <gbenson>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: phoebeCC: chris.ricker, p.van.egdom, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-10 13:37:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Indrajit Raychaudhuri 2002-12-24 10:36:50 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Description of problem:
The verison of squirrelmail provided has got quite old (1.2.7).

Between ver 1.2.7 and the current ver 1.2.10 there has been quite some
changes/enhancements/fixes.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Run rpm -q squirrelmail

Actual Results:
squirrelmail-1.2.7-5

Expected Results:
squirrelmail-1.2.10-xx

Additional info:

See http://www.squirrelmail.org/changelog.php

Comment 1 Chris Ricker 2002-12-29 16:05:03 UTC
*** Bug 80537 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Chris Ricker 2002-12-29 16:07:27 UTC
Not only that, but phoebe is out-of-sync with security errata for RHL 8.0 (which
is currently on a 1.2.8+ errata package)....

Comment 3 Indrajit Raychaudhuri 2003-01-18 21:59:24 UTC
Saw 1.2.10-2 appearing in Rawhide :)

From chagelog the relevant CAN patches seems to applied as well.  I haven't
tested this one though.  This can be closed if there any any other issue.