Bug 80356
Summary: | e100 fails selftest on warm boot and locks up | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 8.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-09-30 15:40:19 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Pete Zaitcev
2002-12-24 22:24:51 UTC
does eepro100 work ? eepro100 works, naturally. It is not power management aware, so it does not shut down the chip on reboot. I compared initialization sequences between e100 and eepro100, and they are not significantly different. With eepro100, sequence is: Power On BIOS initializes chip eepro100 loads reboot eepro100 unloads, lets the chip initialized box reset, but BIOS does not do anything eepro100 loads With e100: Power On BIOS initializes chip e100 loads reboot e100 unloads and shuts the chip down box reset, but BIOS does not do anything e100 loads and cannot initialize the chip Created attachment 88907 [details]
Illustration which removes the symptom
It seems that the stupid intelware does not want to jump from D3 to D0, as the kernel tells it in pci_enable_device => pci_set_power_state(..., 0). Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem persists. The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/ |