Bug 805013
Summary: | Review Request: ecasound - Music application for multitrack audio editing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kalpa Welivitigoda <callkalpa> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | brendan.jones.it, callkalpa, i, james.hogarth, package-review | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-11 16:16:41 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Kalpa Welivitigoda
2012-03-20 12:57:29 UTC
I will review this package. Created attachment 572576 [details]
CCRMA spec file
Hi Kalpa can you please review the above attachment? It shows how this should be packaged (although according to Fedora guidelines of course). regards, Brendan Hi Kalpa, just a reminder as this is being tracked for the audio spin. Brendan Hi Brendan, We are having festival season here so it will take some time. Meanwhile if you or someone else is willing to take over please do. The ecasound package is still available from CCRMA. Kalpa, are you willing to continue on this? Look this package is really important for a lot of blind users. I suggest we get it right first time. I'm happy for it to be provided by CCRMA until we have a packager with a real vested interest in its maintainership. Unfortunately that's not me, and I don't think its Kalpa either. I'll take it. Thanks Christoper No disrespect intended, but please compare the spec from the package currently available in CCRMA to the one submitted here. It is clearly not ready. Kalpa I take it from comment 9 you are not intending to progress this? If not I'll close the bug so interested parties can see no one is actively packaging this. It's been over a week with no response from the requestor to the NeedsInfo flag. Closing as per policy. |