Bug 80558

Summary:	Put httpd-mailman.conf in /etc/httpd/conf.d instead of /etc/httpd/conf
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Public Beta	Reporter:	Indrajit Raychaudhuri <irc>
Component:	mailman	Assignee:	John Dennis <jdennis>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	phoebe	CC:	wtogami
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-01-21 02:16:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	79579

Description Indrajit Raychaudhuri 2002-12-27 21:56:42 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Description of problem:
Now that /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf use the directive
Include conf.d/*.conf to load per-component config, httpd-mailman.conf can be
put in /etc/httpd/conf.d as, say, /etc/httpd/conf.d/mailman.conf instead of
having it as /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-mailman.conf

This would make mailman work 'out of the box' (well almost) and without
insisting on cluttering up httpd.conf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qlf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-mailman.conf


Additional info:

Comment 1 Indrajit Raychaudhuri 2003-01-18 21:51:04 UTC

Found /etc/httpd/conf.d/httpd-mailman.conf in mailman-2.1-2 in Rawhide.

However, it could have been /etc/httpd/conf.d/mailman.conf to be more consistent
(namewise /etc/httpd/conf.d/<packagename>.conf - for example, squirrelmail.conf)

Let John (and others) decide on this and close the bug.  As far as I am
concerned, I am OK and can consider it resolved.

Comment 2 John Dennis 2003-01-20 15:30:14 UTC

When I moved the file to the config directory I considered renaming it but held
back thinking previous users might go looking for a file with the same name. But
I tend to agree with you that mailman.conf is a better name. I think I'll change
the name for the next package.

Comment 3 Jay Turner 2003-01-21 02:16:16 UTC

Fix confirmed with mailman-2.1-3.