Bug 805587
Summary: | Review Request: jquery - The jQuery JavaScript Library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Luke Macken <lmacken> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | a.badger, gregor, kklic, notting, package-review, pfrields |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-09-17 17:26:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 805327 |
Description
Luke Macken
2012-03-21 16:11:55 UTC
Ok, this package is dumb. It probably should take the entire jQuery source tree (probably via git tag snapshot), and build & minify it ourselves. I think jQuery uses the closure compiler to do the minification: https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler There is also a pure-python tool by Google that we could potentially look into: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/browse/branches/bleeding_edge/tools/jsmin.py *** Bug 457343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** How can I help to move this review forward? Here is a jQuery package built from upstream source tree: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jquery.spec http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jquery-1.7.2-1.fc17.src.rpm The build does not contain a minified version. I'd wait until nodejs is packaged into Fedora and then start shipping the minified version the same way as upstream does. Are you interested in maintaining jquery? If yes, you should create your own review request since Luke seems to be unresponsive. I think Karel's package is a much better base than mine, so we should review that going forward. allright, the party is continuing there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857992 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 857992 *** |