Bug 806074

Summary:	libreoffice-debuginfo does not obsolete openoffice.org-debuginfo
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component:	libreoffice	Assignee:	Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	borgan, dtardon
Target Milestone:	alpha
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libreoffice-3.4.5.2-9.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	No Documentation needed	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-20 12:53:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tomas Pelka 2012-03-22 20:31:49 UTC

Description of problem:
SSIA

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libreoffice-3.4.5.2-8

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install (all including debuginfo) latest openoffice.org-*.rpm
2. update to libreoffice
3.
  
Actual results:
after update to libreoffice, openoffice.org-debuginfo is still present on the system

Expected results:
libreoffice-debuginfo should obsolete openoffice.org-debuginfo

Additional info:

Comment 1 David Tardon 2012-03-23 06:39:20 UTC

dtardon->tpelka: seriously? :-)

(In reply to comment #0)
> Expected results:
> libreoffice-debuginfo should obsolete openoffice.org-debuginfo

In general, -debuginfo package is generated automatically by rpmbuild and it is not possible to touch its headers from the spec. Luckily for you, we already generate it ourselves, so it is easy to fix this. Otherwise I would just have put the obsoletes/provides into -core .-)

dtardon->caolanm: fixed in Fedora

Comment 2 Tomas Pelka 2012-03-23 08:09:40 UTC

Yes seriously, in case we retire ooo.org we have to ensure that ALL ooo.org related packages will be replaced.

If it is possible by other components I do not understand why it should be a nonsense for lo.

Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2012-05-01 09:04:24 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Documentation needed

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 12:53:19 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0798.html