Bug 806121
Summary: | configure defined in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros ignores _configure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Dennis Schridde <devurandom> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | bkabrda, mvadkert |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-05-03 08:28:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dennis Schridde
2012-03-22 23:53:33 UTC
Since RHEL 6.3 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Since the fix is so damn simple (s.b.), it would be nice if you could include it in RHEL 6.4 anyway. --- /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros.orig 2012-05-03 09:26:30.055106442 +0200 +++ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros 2012-05-03 09:26:51.112107285 +0200 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; \ CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CXXFLAGS ; \ FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:-%optflags -I%_fmoddir}" ; export FFLAGS ; \ - ./configure --build=%{_build} --host=%{_host} \\\ + %{_configure} --build=%{_build} --host=%{_host} \\\ --target=%{_target_platform} \\\ --program-prefix=%{?_program_prefix} \\\ --prefix=%{_prefix} \\\ *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 652084 *** (In reply to comment #9) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 652084 *** "You are not authorized to access bug #652084." Would be nice if you could fix that, so I can have a look at the other bug myself. (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 652084 *** > "You are not authorized to access bug #652084." > > Would be nice if you could fix that, so I can have a look at the other bug > myself. I still am not allowed to see that bugreport. Could you please change that? |