Bug 80735
Summary: | software raid 5 sync causes incorrect load average | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Steven Pritchard <steve> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-09-30 15:40:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steven Pritchard
2002-12-30 16:51:29 UTC
After the resync finished, the load average dropped back to normal. Bug is still present in i686 kernel-2.4.20-20.9 on the same box. # uptime 2:43pm up 1:11, 2 users, load average: 45.11, 42.69, 36.52 # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid5] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid5 sdg1[5] sdf1[4] sde1[3] sdd1[2] sdc1[1] sdb1[0] 244227520 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU] [===========>.........] resync = 55.1% (26955244/48845504) finish=56.2min speed=6481K/sec unused devices: <none> # uname -a Linux hostname 2.4.20-20.9 #1 Mon Aug 18 11:45:58 EDT 2003 i686 unknown Adding dev.raid.speed_limit_max = 6000 to /etc/sysctl.conf "fixed" the problem on that system, so apparently swamping the SCSI bus was making the load spike insanely. I haven't needed to rebuild the RAID lately to see if recent Fedora kernels behave any differently. Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem persists. The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/ |