Bug 807495
Summary: | fail2ban 0.8.4 has iptables race conditions - latest upstream fixes bug | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Rees <drees76> |
Component: | fail2ban | Assignee: | Axel Thimm <axel.thimm> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 16 | CC: | ali, axel.thimm, jonathan.underwood, maxamillion |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-14 00:54:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Rees
2012-03-28 00:22:43 UTC
I am seeing the latest stable release of fail2ban as 0.8.4 on http://sourceforge.net/projects/fail2ban/ .... where are you getting a 0.8.6 stable release from? -AdamM Fail2ban moved to http://www.fail2ban.org/ and now uses github for downloads: https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/tags -Dave I'm clearly batting 1000 today .... I read right over that part of the fail2ban wiki page. I'll get it packaged and into updates-testing by the end of the evening. Thanks, -AdamM Thanks - let me know when it hits koji and I'll likely give it some testing tomorrow. Unfortunately something came up ... I'll do my best to get to this in the morning though. Apologies for the delay. Apologies for the bump, but have you made any progress on this? Thanks! Ah, my apologies. I actually got an email about this out of band and I replied to that but forgot to include that information here. I don't maintain the Fedora package but as EPEL is a subproject of Fedora I don't want to get the EPEL branch ahead of the Fedora mainline/proper. I will re-assign this to the Fedora branch and once the change has happened "upstream" (in respect to EPEL anyways) I will happily merge in the EPEL branch. -AdamM That works for me. I have some Fedora boxes I can test the packages on as well. Thank you! This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |