Bug 807951
Summary: | Make F18 pass lsb-dist-test-4.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xibo Ning <xning> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Xibo Ning <xning> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dennis |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Tracking |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-07-08 09:26:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 799284, 806190, 806759, 811483 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Xibo Ning
2012-03-29 08:28:12 UTC
To simplify running lsb-dist-test-4.1, I supply an rpm here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/64704553/lsb-dist-testkit-manager-4.1.2-1.src.rpm What tests fail? Hi, Bill. Now I only consider automatic tests. Alsa-T2C Tests v 4.1.0-1 Success Passed: 858 Core Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 13 Passed: 5808 Core-T2C Tests v 4.1.0-1 Success Passed: 157 Cpp-T2C Tests v 4.1.0-1 Success Passed: 1854 Desktop Tests v 4.1.0-2 Failures: 9 Passed: 11832 Desktop-T2C Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 6 Passed: 5125 Libstdc++ Tests v 4.1.0-13 Success Passed: 1790 OLVER Core Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 10 Passed: 8172 Perl Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 78 Passed: 751 Printing Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 11 Passed: 43 Python Runtime Tests v 4.1.1-2 Success Passed: 106 Qt3-Azov Tests v 4.1.0-1 Success Passed: 9792 Qt4-Azov Tests v 4.1.0-1 Failures: 7 Passed: 10769 Xml2-Azov Tests v 4.1.0-1 Success Passed: 1284 Xts5 Tests v 5.1.5-38 Warnings: 10 Passed: 3405 Having a more detailed breakdown of failures filed as separate bugs makes it sane to track. (In reply to comment #4) > Having a more detailed breakdown of failures filed as separate bugs makes it > sane to track. Yes, Bill. That's also my plan. Now I'm reading the lsb test suits source code. Plan to extract the failed test, then, according the failed test, make a little script or c program for every bugs, just like I have done for bug 806190, bug 806759, and bug 799284. So, we are easy to test a bug, and also simple to debug the bug. |