Bug 809840

Summary: Deleting cloud keeps the image entry in conductor
Product: [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine Reporter: Rehana <redakkan>
Component: aeolus-conductorAssignee: Angus Thomas <athomas>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.0.0CC: akarol, deltacloud-maint, morazi, ssachdev
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-24 21:32:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
image_detail
none
auto_image_detail none

Description Rehana 2012-04-04 13:43:55 UTC 
Created attachment 575132 [details]
image_detail

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.login to conductor
2.create new cloud
3.build/push image to this cloud
4. delete the cloud

Actual results:

Observed that the image entry is stilll there but the ami
id and uuid got deleted. keeping this information is of NO USE as user cant do
any operation (rebuild/push)on this image. (PFA: image detail.png)

Also i observed this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798725.
(appears the image details as a result of auto refresh)
(PFA:Auto_image_detail.png)
  

Expected results:
It is also expected to remove the image entry (like name) from conductor

Additional info:

rpm -qa | grep aeolus
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.2-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.1-1.el6.noarch
Comment 1 Rehana 2012-04-04 13:44:24 UTC 
Created attachment 575133 [details]
auto_image_detail
Comment 3 Mike Orazi 2013-01-24 21:32:06 UTC 
This should be addressed when we convert to imgfac2.0/tim.