| Summary: | Zabbix should depend on (and pull in) traceroute | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | David Kovalsky <dkovalsk> |
| Component: | zabbix | Assignee: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | benl, dan, jeff, nelsonab, volker27 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | zabbix-1.8.12-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-30 07:58:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
David Kovalsky
2012-04-09 01:04:59 UTC
On the other hand you could argue to remove the traceroute example from the database dump. Since traceroute has no additional dependencies and probably makes sense on a monitoring server, one could add it. Good call :) The tools are even configurable in the web UI with admin privs. But I agree, traceroute does make sense to me on a monitoring server too. It's really a small package with no additional dependencies. thanks for opinions, traceroute will be added in 1.8.12 |