Bug 811135

Summary: readdir64_r calls fail with ELOOP [rhel-6.2.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: RHEL Product and Program Management <pm-rhel>
Component: kernelAssignee: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Boris Ranto <branto>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2CC: branto, dejohnso, dhoward, eguan, fgozalo0, fharshav, jlayton, jwest, kgc, kmasaryk, ltroan, marcus, mclaughlinct, mishu, moshiro, ndevos, nfs-maint, plyons, pm-eus, rdassen, rwheeler, steved, tak, tim, toracat, torel, tru, yanwang
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-220.15.1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-15 19:21:02 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On: 770250    
Bug Blocks:    

Description RHEL Product and Program Management 2012-04-10 04:55:45 EDT
This bug has been copied from bug #770250 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.2 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 Kevin Masaryk 2012-04-10 18:02:48 EDT
TAM customer Qualcomm is getting hit by this bug and would like an update on when the fix will be available for 6.2.
Comment 8 Tore H. Larsen 2012-05-12 19:09:34 EDT
cc
Comment 10 Tim Niemueller 2012-05-15 18:20:14 EDT
Any information when the new kernel will be released?
Comment 11 Akemi Yagi 2012-05-15 19:02:10 EDT
kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6 was just released today and it has this patch:

[fs] nfs: Additional readdir cookie loop information (Steve Dickson) [811135 770250]
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-15 19:21:02 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0571.html