Bug 811155

Summary:	Implement guest driver changes needed to pass RX checksum offload tests with WHQL
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Quan Wenli <wquan>
Component:	virtio-win	Assignee:	Yvugenfi <yvugenfi>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.3	CC:	acathrow, bcao, bsarathy, dyasny, michen, rhod, shuang
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-09-03 06:37:50 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Quan Wenli 2012-04-10 10:02:04 UTC

Description of problem:

Currently RX checksum feature is disabled by default as WHQL will not only
test that the driver reports valid packer but test actual checksum as well. As
in some cases checksum on the how will not be calculated (although the packet
is valid) - the test will fail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

virtio-win-prewhql-24 

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Yvugenfi@redhat.com 2012-04-10 11:27:56 UTC

I suggest to move it to RHEL6.4 as we don't have functional issue, and we only need to satisfy WHQL test that passes currently in our default configuration.

Comment 3 Ronen Hod 2012-04-12 15:38:02 UTC

Agree with the previous comment. Moving to 6.4.

Comment 5 Yvugenfi@redhat.com 2012-07-15 15:07:18 UTC

Duplicates #834175 - in HCK supporting RX checksum offload is a must.

Comment 6 Yvugenfi@redhat.com 2012-07-15 15:08:05 UTC

http://git.engineering.redhat.com/?p=users/yvugenfi/internal-kvm-guest-drivers-windows/.git;a=commit;h=af97e1553b2c5bbf20ee33471ab89256ea370725

Comment 7 Mike Cao 2012-08-24 03:13:48 UTC

Hi, Yan

Since this bug is dup of #834175  ,May I close this one ?

Thanks,Mike

Comment 8 Yvugenfi@redhat.com 2012-08-26 11:22:56 UTC

Hi Mike,

Yes - I think you can close this one.

Best regards,
Yan.

Comment 9 Yvugenfi@redhat.com 2012-08-26 11:27:02 UTC

Hi Mike,

Yes - I think you can close this one.

Best regards,
Yan.

Comment 10 Mike Cao 2012-09-03 06:37:50 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 834175 ***