Bug 811168
Summary: | fix pam_get_authtok_verify() to respect the authtok_type= option | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert> |
Component: | pam | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | dapospis, dspurek |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | pam-1.1.1-12.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
The PAM_AUTHTOK_TYPE PAM item was not properly saved in the pam_get_authtok_verify() function.
Consequence:
The authentication token type as specified with authtok_type option of pam_cracklib module was not respected in the 'Retype new password' message.
Fix:
pam_get_authtok_verify() function was fixed to properly save the PAM_AUTHTOK_TYPE item.
Result:
The authentication token type as specified with authtok_type option of pam_cracklib module is now respected in the 'Retype new password' message.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 10:36:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Miroslav Vadkerti
2012-04-10 10:26:23 UTC
This depends on the following modules in the PAM stack. If they used the pam_get_authtok() function, it would work. Unfortunately pam_unix doesn't. Basically this is request to modify pam_unix to use pam_get_authtok() function to obtain the password. I was wrong in comment #1 - this is actually bug in pam_get_authtok_verify(). Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0521.html |