| Summary: | mails: Precedence: bulk | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Harald Reindl <h.reindl> |
| Component: | cronie | Assignee: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | mmaslano, pertusus, tmraz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-12 11:18:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Harald Reindl
2012-04-10 10:56:13 UTC
From RFC3834 <citation> A response MAY include a Precedence field [I4.RFC2076] in order to discourage responses from some kinds of responders which predate this specification. The field-body of the Precedence field MAY consist of the text "junk", "list", "bulk", or other text deemed appropriate by the responder. Because the Precedence field is non-standard and its interpretation varies widely, the use of Precedence is not specifically recommended by this specification, nor does this specification recommend any particular value for that field. </citation> I guess it can't break anything if I add a line into do_command.c file. this would be very nice! most auto-responders and mailing-lists are using this header even postfix mailing-list and Wietse Venema is really a hardliner in context of smtp Thanks for idea. I pushed it as commit 1d42d62a372125fe9d5c97136dff042d2f2aba79 I'll add it into the next cronie release. thank you! |