Bug 811211

Summary:	[ipa webui] Refresh issue with re-adding objects with same name as deleted objects
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Namita Soman <nsoman>
Component:	ipa	Assignee:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Namita Soman <nsoman>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.2	CC:	jgalipea, mkosek, mvarun, xdong, yzhang
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ipa-3.0.0-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 09:10:49 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Namita Soman 2012-04-10 12:46:47 UTC

Description of problem:
Add a privilege, add permissions
Delete this privilege
Re-Add and edit a privilege with same name, and it will list permissions selected for this readded privilege - same as what the deleted privilege with same name had. Hit Refresh, and it is cleared

Similar issue with most objects...add a user, set title, delete this user, and readd user with same name....setting indicate same title as deleted user. Hit Refresh, and it is cleared

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ipa-server-2.2.0-8.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add and edit an object - say a privilege
2. Add permissions
3. Delete this privilege
4. Add and edit privilege with same name

  
Actual results:
This new privilege has permissions selected (from same named privilege which was deleted)

Expected results:
No permissions should be listed for this new privilege.

Same issue with other objects

Additional info:

Comment 2 Rob Crittenden 2012-04-10 13:08:53 UTC

Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2618

Comment 3 Martin Kosek 2012-08-14 06:29:17 UTC

Fixed upstream:
master: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/changeset/690211adb52647efb6bb55919dec980d3660016e

Comment 4 Petr Vobornik 2012-08-27 12:25:12 UTC

*** Bug 817121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Jenny Severance 2012-09-25 16:38:11 UTC

automated regression test exists

Comment 9 Varun Mylaraiah 2013-01-18 14:45:51 UTC

verified in ipa-server-3.0.0-22.el6.x86_64


https://wiki.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com/qa/archive/ipa/webui/automation/firefox/test-output-ipa-server-3.0.0-QA/0114_64bit/full%20suite/IPARBACTestSuite/index.html



testReaddingPrivilege_Bug811211
Bug 811211 - Readding privilege
Parameters: bug811211_ReaddingPrivilege, bug811211_permission, write, (givenname=abc), carlicense, bug811211_privilege, bug811211_privilege desc
Show output Show all outputs
Starting Test: testReaddingPrivilege_Bug811211([bug811211_ReaddingPrivilege, bug811211_permission, write, (givenname=abc), carlicense, bug811211_privilege, bug811211_privilege desc])

Starting Test: testReaddingPrivilege_Bug811211([bug811211_ReaddingPrivilege, bug811211_permission, write, (givenname=abc), carlicense, bug811211_privilege, bug811211_privilege desc])

Add Permission - bug811211_permission

Asserted: Verified permission write is checked for bug811211_permission

Asserted: Actual value of '(givenname=abc)' matches expected value: Verified filter (givenname=abc) for bug811211_permission

Asserted: Actual value of 'carlicense' matches expected value.

Add Privilege - bug811211_privilege

Asserted: Actual value of 'bug811211_privilege desc' matches expected value.

Asserted: Verified bug811211_permission is listed for bug811211_privilege

Re-add Privilege - bug811211_privilege

Asserted: No permissions added

Test Passed: testReaddingPrivilege_Bug811211([bug811211_ReaddingPrivilege, bug811211_permission, write, (givenname=abc), carlicense, bug811211_privilege, bug811211_privilege desc])

Test Passed: testReaddingPrivilege_Bug811211([bug811211_ReaddingPrivilege, bug811211_permission, write, (givenname=abc), carlicense, bug811211_privilege, bug811211_privilege desc])

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:10:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0528.html