Bug 811239

The Data::Dumper module has been sub-packaged in perl-5.14.2-213.fc18.

Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated


==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[!]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/811239/Data-Dumper-2.131.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : 653ac6576e6916446419ae4ba786073f
  MD5SUM upstream package : 653ac6576e6916446419ae4ba786073f
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[!]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
FIX: Both BuildRequire and Require Scalar::Util


Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git
External plugins:

You're right. Updated package is at the same place.

diff --git a/perl-Data-Dumper.spec b/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
index fdd8d14..70febf5 100644
--- a/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
+++ b/perl-Data-Dumper.spec
@@ -10,12 +10,14 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # Run-time:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Scalar::Util)
 BuildRequires:  perl(XSLoader)
 # Tests only:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) >= 0.60
 # Optional tests:
 BuildRequires:  perl(Encode)
 Requires:       perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $versi
+Requires:       perl(Scalar::Util)
 Requires:       perl(XSLoader)
 
 %{?perl_default_filter}

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Data-Dumper 
Short Description: Stringify perl data structures, suitable for printing and eval
Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Thank you for the review and the repository.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Data-Dumper
New Branches: el6
Owners: averi psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

Git done (by process-git-requests).

This module is bundled with the EL-6 perl package and *cannot* be in EPEL-6!

# yum install 'perl(Data::Dumper)'
Loaded plugins: rhnplugin
This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or RHN Satellite.
Setting up Install Process
Package 4:perl-5.10.1-131.el6_4.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do