Bug 81129

Summary:	Should X log go somewhere meaningful in Beta versions?
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Aleksey Nogin <aleksey>
Component:	anaconda	Assignee:	Michael Fulbright <msf>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9	CC:	mharris
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-05-25 14:58:31 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aleksey Nogin 2003-01-05 08:03:36 UTC

Currently anaconda runs X with "... -logfile /dev/null ...". Would it be worth
it to change it in beta versions to log into a real file to facilitate bug
reporting?

Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2003-01-08 21:01:17 UTC

Yes we could log it to /tmp/ramfs for the betas. Thanks for the idea.

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2003-03-14 17:48:25 UTC

The X log file is going into /tmp/ramfs if it exists.

Comment 3 Brent Fox 2003-05-25 14:58:31 UTC

I'm going through Bugzilla closing some bugs that have been marked as Modified
for some period of time.  I believe that most of these issues have been fixed,
so I'm resolving these bugs as Rawhide.  If the bug you are seeing still exists,
please reopen this report and mark it as Reopened.