| Summary: | System Properties for registered system lists "Arch" as blank | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | James Laska <jlaska> | ||||
| Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Tom McKay <tomckay> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Og Maciel <omaciel> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | achan, asettle, cpelland, dmacpher, jturner, mmccune, omaciel, tomckay | ||||
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream | ||||
| Target Release: | Unused | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: |
In the System Details page, the System property "Arch" was not populated when an i386/i686 system was registered. System Engine failed to display the architecture correctly. This fix adds i386/i686 to the defined architectures. All x86-compatible architectures now show up on the System Details page.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||
| : | 817658 828311 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 19:44:43 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 817658, 828311 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
James Laska
2012-04-13 16:35:53 UTC
Update - This affects *all* RHEL i386 registered systems, RHEL5 and RHEL6. Anyone know how severe it is that registered i386 systems do not properly display their architecture in the system summary on Katello? Is this just a minor UI issue, or is the lack of architecture data more fundamental. == Additional data == * I'm able to successfully find x86_64 systems by searching for 'system.machine:x86_64'. * I'm able to successfully find i386 systems by searching for 'system.machine:i686' I have no idea if this is good/bad? If this is just a UI quirk, this feels safe to move to 1.1.0. Please advise. The info displayed comes from the system fact uname.machine passed through
{ 'i386' => 'x86', 'ia64' => 'Itanium', 'x86_64' => 'x86_64', 'ppc' => 'PowerPC',
's390' => 'IBM S/390', 's390x' => 'IBM System z', 'sparc64' => 'SPARC Solaris' }
This is only a display issue, though it clearly is an issue in this case.
Thanks Tom, proposing for cloudforms-1.1.0 and 1.0.z. This is not critical for the 1.0 release. Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/Katello/katello Commit: ce272e099d3bcd55eddde882c64118db3cdd52ad https://github.com/Katello/katello/commit/ce272e099d3bcd55eddde882c64118db3cdd52ad Author: Tom McKay <thomasmckay> Date: 2012-04-30 (Mon, 30 Apr 2012) Verified using: * candlepin-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch * candlepin-selinux-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch * candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch * katello-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch * katello-all-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch * katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch * katello-cli-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch * katello-cli-common-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch * katello-common-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch * katello-configure-1.1.9-3.el6cf.noarch * katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch * katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch * katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch * pulp-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch * pulp-common-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch * pulp-selinux-server-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html |