Bug 81285
Summary: | [RFE] mediacheck's importantance should be more pronounced to the end-user (about, errors, etc.) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Michael Lee Yohe <michael> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Michael Fulbright <msf> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 8.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-01-21 20:02:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael Lee Yohe
2003-01-07 16:20:43 UTC
*** Bug 81284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Thanks for the suggestion. I've changed the message to more like what you have in your email. It still lets you continue even if you had some failed tests, but honestly I have RARELY had a bad cd report where they'd tested the CD, as the anaconda.log logs the test results and I can see this in their traceback. Right, Michael - I figured the standard "mediacheck" would explain the common sense behind what it's trying to do, but apparently people actually just attempt to assume what it's doing, continue, and break their installations. That's cool - will try it when the new beta is released. New text confirmed. |