Bug 812855
Summary: | New Bug::search function is severely limited | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Martin Kosek <mkosek> |
Component: | WebService | Assignee: | PnT DevOps Devs <hss-ied-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.2 | CC: | sgreen |
Target Milestone: | 4.2-1 | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.2.0-0.b26 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-04-20 01:44:34 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 786624 |
Description
Martin Kosek
2012-04-16 12:49:39 UTC
I've fixed bugzilla.runQuery and RedHat.runQuery so that it should work as it previously did. I've also modified Bug.search so it will accept 'quicksearch' or 'savedsearch' key to return the expected rows. You can give it a test run at: https://bug812855.bugzilla.devel.redhat.com/ I haven't updated the Bug.search documentation yet. Will do that tomorrow. -- simon Thanks Simon, I will test this against your server with our XMLRPC based tool. Is it now possible to pass also column_list to limit the returned data and request fields that are not returned by default (flags)? (In reply to comment #2) > Is it now possible to pass also column_list to limit the returned data and > request fields that are not returned by default (flags)? No, column_list is depreciated for upstream written RPC calls (part of moving as close as possible to match upstream calls). From https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.html: "In addition to the parameters below, this method also accepts the standard include_fields and exclude_fields arguments" If there are any fields you cannot get that you want, can you file a separate bug for them? (other than dependson / blockedby which you have already field). Thanks. -- simon Have committed this code and will be fixed in 4.2.0-0.b26 and later. The documentation has been updated to show the extra options too. I wanted to test the fix now, but it seems that your test instance is not alive: https://bug812855.bugzilla.devel.redhat.com/ Official partner-bugzilla instance is still on version 4.2.0-0.b25. (In reply to comment #5) > but it seems that your test instance is not alive: It was taken down once I committed the code changes. Partner bugzilla will be updated later this morning (EDT) with this change, among others. |