Bug 813155

Summary:	create app with latest rhc client return 'execution expired' error and app created successfully on the instance
Product:	OKD	Reporter:	Meng Bo <bmeng>
Component:	oc	Assignee:	Clayton Coleman <ccoleman>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	libra bugs <libra-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	1.x	CC:	mshao, rmillner, xtian
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-04-17 17:25:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Meng Bo 2012-04-17 05:51:03 UTC

Description of problem:
try to create app via rhc client on Mac with latest rhc client 0.90.6, it will return 'execution expired' error from the client side, and the app was created successfully on the instance.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhc-0.90.6
rhc-rest-0.0.14

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install rhc client 0.90.6 on Mac
gem install rhc --source http://$libra_repo/ --version=0.90.6
2.try to create app with user has domain
3.
  
Actual results:
create app will return 'execution expired' error, and the app created successfully on the instance.

Expected results:
correct output returns when creating app

Additional info:
this issue does not happen on rhc-0.90.5 on Mac.
this issue does not happen on rhc-0.90.6 on RHEL and Fedora.

Comment 1 Meng Bo 2012-04-17 07:38:15 UTC

According to this comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813110#c1

This issue also happens on Linux with latest rhc client(0.91.1).

And after check the /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/user-gems/rhc-0.90.6/lib/rhc-common.rb on Mac, it also has the line "http.open_timeout = @mytimeout"

Comment 2 Xiaoli Tian 2012-04-17 13:28:51 UTC

*** Bug 813265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Rob Millner 2012-04-17 17:25:20 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 813110 ***