Bug 814245

Summary:	RFE: package Eclipse m2e plugin
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jan Vlug <jan.public>
Component:	eclipse	Assignee:	Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	16	CC:	akurtako, andjrobins, iheim, kdaniel, patrickm, rgrunber, sgehwolf, swagiaal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-12-04 16:41:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Jan Vlug 2012-04-19 12:58:34 UTC

Description of problem:
The Fedora repository does not provide the m2e (Maven to Eclipse) Eclipse plugin.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:
The Fedora repository should contain a package that provides the m2e plugin

Additional info:
http://www.eclipse.org/m2e/

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2012-04-19 13:09:49 UTC

How would you like to package it?  It's not too hard and we can give you assistance.  The guidelines are here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:EclipsePlugins

Comment 2 Roland Grunberg 2012-04-19 13:33:02 UTC

In addition, I can see that the source makes use of poms (and some tycho dependencies) so building with tycho (0.14.1) could also be a possibility.

Comment 3 Itamar Heim 2012-11-29 08:56:53 UTC

duplicate of bug 847160- Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration for Eclipse?

Comment 4 Roland Grunberg 2012-12-04 16:41:17 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> duplicate of bug 847160- Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration
> for Eclipse?

You're right. I'm marking this as a duplicate of Bug 847160. The review process has stalled a bit though.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 847160 ***