Bug 814245

Summary: RFE: package Eclipse m2e plugin
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jan Vlug <jan.public>
Component: eclipseAssignee: Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: akurtako, andjrobins, iheim, kdaniel, patrickm, rgrunber, sgehwolf, swagiaal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 16:41:17 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Vlug 2012-04-19 12:58:34 UTC
Description of problem:
The Fedora repository does not provide the m2e (Maven to Eclipse) Eclipse plugin.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:
The Fedora repository should contain a package that provides the m2e plugin

Additional info:
http://www.eclipse.org/m2e/

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2012-04-19 13:09:49 UTC
How would you like to package it?  It's not too hard and we can give you assistance.  The guidelines are here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:EclipsePlugins

Comment 2 Roland Grunberg 2012-04-19 13:33:02 UTC
In addition, I can see that the source makes use of poms (and some tycho dependencies) so building with tycho (0.14.1) could also be a possibility.

Comment 3 Itamar Heim 2012-11-29 08:56:53 UTC
duplicate of bug 847160- Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration for Eclipse?

Comment 4 Roland Grunberg 2012-12-04 16:41:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> duplicate of bug 847160- Review Request: eclipse-m2e-core - Maven integration
> for Eclipse?

You're right. I'm marking this as a duplicate of Bug 847160. The review process has stalled a bit though.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 847160 ***