Bug 814978

Summary: Review Request: shrinkwrap - A simple mechanism to assemble Java archives
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: gil cattaneo <puntogil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, mizdebsk, notting, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mizdebsk: fedora-review-
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-24 12:24:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description gil cattaneo 2012-04-21 20:03:42 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap-1.1.0-1.fc16.alpha.1.src.rpm
Description: Shrinkwrap provides a simple mechanism to assemble archives
like JARs, WARs, and EARs with a friendly, fluent API.


Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4011470

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2012-05-24 12:07:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap-1.1.0-0.1.alpha.1.fc16.src.rpm
> - edit Release tag

The SRPM and spec file don't match.
Please correct that before I can take the review.

$ curl -s http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap-1.1.0-0.1.alpha.1.fc16.src.rpm | rpm2cpio | pax -r

$ curl -s http://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap.spec | cmp shrinkwrap.spec -
shrinkwrap.spec - differ: byte 21, line 1

Comment 4 Mikolaj Izdebski 2012-05-24 12:20:52 UTC
I'm taking this review.

Comment 5 Mikolaj Izdebski 2012-05-24 12:24:13 UTC
Fedora already has identical package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819022

Closing this review request.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 819022 ***