Bug 814987

Summary: FTBFS in EL-7 (solved)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matěj Cepl <mcepl>
Component: rubygem-test-unitAssignee: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mcepl, mtasaka
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-22 05:53:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
suggested patch on .spec file none

Description Matěj Cepl 2012-04-21 21:32:07 UTC
Created attachment 579225 [details]
suggested patch on .spec file

Description of problem:
spec file has only Fedora conditionals, which don't work on RHEL. see attached patch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rubygem-test-unit-2.4.5-2.fc17

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2012-04-22 02:57:03 UTC
Why do I have to modify spec for RHEL 7, of which I can never know the status of development? RHEL status can only be seen by Redhat people, and I can never know what the correct answer is!!

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2012-04-22 03:00:22 UTC
A more bit explanation:
So I don't know if the spec file you attached is correct because I don't know the status of RHEL. If you need some fix for RHEL7, it should be done internally on Redhat, not on Fedora.

So basically speaking, if people say "your spec file doesn't work on RHEL", I have to say "I don't know because I don't know RHEL". I only care for Fedora.

Comment 3 Matěj Cepl 2012-04-22 05:53:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> A more bit explanation:
> So I don't know if the spec file you attached is correct because I don't know
> the status of RHEL. If you need some fix for RHEL7, it should be done
> internally on Redhat, not on Fedora.

OK, I thought that the suggested fix is self-explaining. But if you don't want to apply it, your call.