| Summary: | SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/openl2tpd from 'name_bind' accesses on the udp_socket port 925. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | ManFree <roman_romul> |
| Component: | l2tpd | Assignee: | Orphan Owner <extras-orphan> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | dominick.grift, dwalsh, extras-orphan, mgrepl |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:bc6a310dbe0618d95556c0341f060ba108a320282689155409269e41a12b45c3 | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-04-25 15:22:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Why is openl2tpd using 925 port? I don't know, but it is default also. Fixed in selinux-policy-3.10.0-86.fc16 No problem in selinux-policy-3.10.0-87.fc16. Fixed. |
libreport version: 2.0.6 executable: /usr/bin/python hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 3.1.0-7.fc16.i686 reason: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/openl2tpd from 'name_bind' accesses on the udp_socket port 925. time: Mon Apr 23 02:42:13 2012 description: :SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/openl2tpd from 'name_bind' accesses on the udp_socket port 925. : :***** Plugin bind_ports (99.5 confidence) suggests ************************* : :If you want to allow /usr/sbin/openl2tpd to bind to network port 925 :Then you need to modify the port type. :Do :# semanage port -a -t PORT_TYPE -p udp 925 : where PORT_TYPE is one of the following: unreserved_port_t, port_t, l2tp_port_t. : :***** Plugin catchall (1.49 confidence) suggests *************************** : :If you believe that openl2tpd should be allowed name_bind access on the port 925 udp_socket by default. :Then you should report this as a bug. :You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. :Do :allow this access for now by executing: :# grep openl2tpd /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol :# semodule -i mypol.pp : :Additional Information: :Source Context system_u:system_r:l2tpd_t:s0 :Target Context system_u:object_r:hi_reserved_port_t:s0 :Target Objects port 925 [ udp_socket ] :Source openl2tpd :Source Path /usr/sbin/openl2tpd :Port 925 :Host (removed) :Source RPM Packages openl2tp-1.8-5.fc16.R :Target RPM Packages :Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.10.0-84.fc16 :Selinux Enabled True :Policy Type targeted :Enforcing Mode Enforcing :Host Name (removed) :Platform Linux (removed) 3.1.0-7.fc16.i686 #1 : SMP Tue Nov 1 21:00:16 UTC 2011 i686 i686 :Alert Count 18 :First Seen Пн. 23 апр. 2012 02:39:54 :Last Seen Пн. 23 апр. 2012 02:40:28 :Local ID aade4023-1d2f-4024-9337-d80f6456a861 : :Raw Audit Messages :type=AVC msg=audit(1335134428.819:123): avc: denied { name_bind } for pid=4560 comm="openl2tpd" src=925 scontext=system_u:system_r:l2tpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:hi_reserved_port_t:s0 tclass=udp_socket : : :type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1335134428.819:123): arch=i386 syscall=socketcall success=no exit=EACCES a0=2 a1=bfc086e0 a2=4d2aaff4 a3=bfc08700 items=0 ppid=1 pid=4560 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=openl2tpd exe=/usr/sbin/openl2tpd subj=system_u:system_r:l2tpd_t:s0 key=(null) : :Hash: openl2tpd,l2tpd_t,hi_reserved_port_t,udp_socket,name_bind : :audit2allow : :#============= l2tpd_t ============== :allow l2tpd_t hi_reserved_port_t:udp_socket name_bind; : :audit2allow -R : :#============= l2tpd_t ============== :allow l2tpd_t hi_reserved_port_t:udp_socket name_bind; :