Bug 815503
Summary: | migration of rhel6.2.0 guest from RHEL6.3 host to RHEL6.2 host fails "error Unknown controller type 'usb'" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Laine Stump <laine> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Jiri Denemark <jdenemar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | acathrow, ashoham, berrange, dallan, dyasny, dyuan, eblake, iheim, juzhang, jyang, michen, mzhan, pstehlik, qzhang, rwu, veillard, weizhan, zhpeng |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-0.9.10-17.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-20 06:57:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 806633, 806975, 841379, 1015081 |
Description
Laine Stump
2012-04-23 18:17:36 UTC
> The stable machine type interface should provide us the compatibility. > > So if machine type = 6.2.0 then filter out the XML. No, this problem is completely unrelated to the guest machine type version, and cannot be solved using that information. Machine types relate to the QEMU guest hardware, not the libvirt version. If we did a fix based on the machine type == 6.2.0, then this would affect every future version of RHEL 6, ie running a guest with machine type == 6.2.0 on a RHEL-6.5 host, trying to migrate to a RHEL-6.4 host. This is clearly wrong. Any version check must be against the libvirt version number Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0748.html Hi Jiri, Do we also need to allow 6.1.z->6.4->6.1.z ? The same problem occurred when doing migration back from rhel6.4 to rhel6.1.z We aren't yet sure if 6.1.z->6.4->6.1.z is supported, but after preliminary discussion decided you should open a new BZ that mentions this BZ in the description and we'll talk about it there. (the reason for this is that once a BZ has been marked as CLOSED ERRATA, it should never be re-opened). Thanks for your reply. The new bug is Bug 856864 |