Bug 816447

Summary:	RFE:object-storage: enhance the response by status command
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Saurabh <saujain>
Component:	object-storage	Assignee:	crisbud <crisbud>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	pre-release	CC:	crisbud, gluster-bugs, mzywusko, ppai, vagarwal, vbellur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-01-27 15:07:52 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Saurabh 2012-04-26 05:47:14 UTC

Description of problem:
Presently the status provided by the 
"swift-init main|proxy|account|container|object status" provides the status of the running servers, not the number of worker threads, etc. 

It will be helpful to enhance the response of status command by providing more information like the number of worker threads for each server and timeout values   in each server. 

As in large setups over large machines having many cores this kind of information will help manageability.

Same idea if can be implemented for original swift also may be a feature to collaborate with them.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gluster-swift-1.0 and openstack-swift-1.4.8

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 crisbud@redhat.com 2013-08-28 06:54:19 UTC

"swift-init main|proxy|account|container|object status"

It may need to check if default Openstack swift provides this or not ? And based on that it may need G4S to provide the same or otherwise.

Comment 3 crisbud@redhat.com 2013-08-28 06:56:52 UTC

Needs more discussion, planning if this is to be added a feature along with G4S.

Comment 4 Prashanth Pai 2014-01-27 14:43:48 UTC

This enhancement has to be implemented in Openstack Swift, not in gluster-swift.

Comment 5 crisbud@redhat.com 2014-01-27 15:07:52 UTC

Perhaps we can close the bug with QE acknowledgement. adding Pushpesh and Sourabh. As this requires fixes in Openstack Swift and not in gluster-swift code.