Bug 816811
Summary: | RFE: Extensible topic types | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] PressGang CCMS | Reporter: | Joshua Wulf <jwulf> |
Component: | Web-UI | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 1.x | CC: | topic-tool-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joshua Wulf
2012-04-27 04:51:02 UTC
A couple of additional factors: 1) Sub-classing new topic types from the three base types is important for forward-compatibility with DITA. 2) The Content Spec Processor will probably need to pull a list of supported topic-types by name from the server to validate a spec. I'd be happy to get extensible topic types with templates before CSP support for them is available, because I can create a book using the base types, and then manually set the subclassed topic types in the Skynet interface. |