Bug 817544
Summary: | 3.1 - VDSM - Storage: disconnectStoragePool fails | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Daniel Paikov <dpaikov> | ||||
Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Gadi Ickowicz <gickowic> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | high | ||||||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | abaron, bazulay, hateya, iheim, ilvovsky, nlevinki, sgrinber, ykaul | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | storage | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.9.6-22.0 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-05 07:49:37 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Regression? Why is it marked a regression? Since which vdsm version? (In reply to comment #3) > Why is it marked a regression? Since which vdsm version? AFAIK this used to work in 3.0. Changed title: 3.1 - VDSM - Storage: Reconstruct on local storage fails -> disconnectStoragePool fails. disconnectStoragePool will fail disregarding the storage domain type. Should be fixed by: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/3929/20 But the real issue is that hostID has nothing to do with pool / SDM semantics. Fixed in 4.9.6-22.0: * Mon Jul 16 2012 Igor Lvovsky <ilvovsky> - 4.9.6-22.0 - BZ#839330 Monitor the host id in domainMonitor verified on SI13. Master domain is reconstructed on 2nd domain. vdsm-4.9.6-26.0.el6_3.x86_64 |
Created attachment 581181 [details] vdsm.log * Local storage pool with 2 data domains. * Initiate failure in master domain. * Reconstruct fails because disconnectStoragePool fails.