Bug 820145
Summary: | eclipse-platform: Bundled library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk> |
Component: | eclipse | Assignee: | Krzysztof Daniel <kdaniel> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | akurtako, andjrobins, jerboaa, kdaniel, mbenitez, overholt, rgrunber, swagiaal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=175116 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-03-13 11:34:50 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 504493 |
Description
Mikolaj Izdebski
2012-05-09 09:28:38 UTC
The library is not bundled. Eclipse keeps a customized copy of sources (see eclipse bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=175116 comment 5). Eclipse contributed some patches to lucene-demo, which were eventually inlcuded into lucene 3.1+ (not in Fedora or Eclipse). The library should be seen as a lucene-deriverative work in eclipse-plugin, not as a bundled library. I'll try, however, to build lucene 2.9 with required patches, and then, rebuild Eclipse with that lucene. Patches did not applied for lucene 2.9. Having in mind that Eclipse right now ships lucene-demo deriverative work, I will continue working on this in f18, when Eclipse will ship to lucene 3+, and it will be possible to get rid off custom lucene-demo from eclipse help. Existing code in Eclipse is patched, and should be actually considered as a custom implementation of HTML parser, which has no counterpart in the existing lucene core, depspite having a very similar name, |