Bug 822642

Summary: CVE-2012-2130 polarssl: weak key generation in 0.99pre4 throught to 1.1.1 [fedora-17]
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vincent Danen <vdanen>
Component: polarsslAssignee: Mads Kiilerich <mads>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 17CC: mads
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-19 16:11:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 822639    

Description Vincent Danen 2012-05-17 17:06:03 UTC
This is an automatically created tracking bug!  It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora
versions.

For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.

For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs

When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the
bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response"
product (the top-level CVE bugs).  Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed
in the RPM changelog when available.

Bodhi update submission link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=822639

fedora-17 tracking bug for polarssl: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s).

[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]

Comment 1 Mads Kiilerich 2012-05-17 22:02:25 UTC
Fedora 17 has polarssl-1.1.3-1.fc17 - what is the deal?

Comment 2 Vincent Danen 2012-05-19 16:11:00 UTC
Oh, if that's the case then sorry, my script must have had old data.  Checking now I see this is right.  Thanks!