Bug 823055

Summary: RFE: CLI option to check ports.
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Gowrishankar Rajaiyan <grajaiya>
Component: glusterdAssignee: krishnan parthasarathi <kparthas>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.3-betaCC: gluster-bugs, grajaiya, nsathyan, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-04 09:40:29 EDT Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-05-18 17:37:20 EDT
Description of problem:
It is evident that there seems to be a confusion on which ports should be opened on the server. We should have a cli option to "gluster" command which would check and print the necessary ports that needs to be opened. Raising as an RFE to have this triage d.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glusterfs-3.3.0beta4-1.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2012-05-19 02:12:42 EDT
Doesn't 'gluster volume status' suffice this requirement?
Comment 2 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-06-01 16:45:46 EDT
<snip>
19-05-2012 02:50:40 > shanks: jdarcy, think we should have a cli option to check which ports should be opened ? would it be a valid RFE ?

19-05-2012 02:51:12 < jdarcy!quassel@nat/redhat/x-hcbczmrkxevlbjbm: shanks: That sounds like a really useful thing to have, so yeah, it'd be totally valid.\

19-05-2012 02:51:48 > shanks: jdarcy, great! raising one. 
</snip>

But yes, 'gluster volume status' does seem to suffice this requirement.
Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2012-06-04 09:40:29 EDT
Closing this as 'volume status' addresses this requirement.