Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||RFE: CLI option to check ports.|
|Product:||[Community] GlusterFS||Reporter:||Gowrishankar Rajaiyan <grajaiya>|
|Component:||glusterd||Assignee:||krishnan parthasarathi <kparthas>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:|
|Version:||3.3-beta||CC:||gluster-bugs, grajaiya, nsathyan, vbellur|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2012-06-04 09:40:29 EDT||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-05-18 17:37:20 EDT
Description of problem: It is evident that there seems to be a confusion on which ports should be opened on the server. We should have a cli option to "gluster" command which would check and print the necessary ports that needs to be opened. Raising as an RFE to have this triage d. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): glusterfs-3.3.0beta4-1.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2012-05-19 02:12:42 EDT
Doesn't 'gluster volume status' suffice this requirement?
Comment 2 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-06-01 16:45:46 EDT
<snip> 19-05-2012 02:50:40 > shanks: jdarcy, think we should have a cli option to check which ports should be opened ? would it be a valid RFE ? 19-05-2012 02:51:12 < jdarcy!quassel@nat/redhat/x-hcbczmrkxevlbjbm: shanks: That sounds like a really useful thing to have, so yeah, it'd be totally valid.\ 19-05-2012 02:51:48 > shanks: jdarcy, great! raising one. </snip> But yes, 'gluster volume status' does seem to suffice this requirement.
Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2012-06-04 09:40:29 EDT
Closing this as 'volume status' addresses this requirement.