Bug 823055

Summary:	RFE: CLI option to check ports.
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Gowrishankar Rajaiyan <grajaiya>
Component:	glusterd	Assignee:	krishnan parthasarathi <kparthas>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.3-beta	CC:	gluster-bugs, grajaiya, nsathyan, vbellur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-04 13:40:29 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-05-18 21:37:20 UTC

Description of problem:
It is evident that there seems to be a confusion on which ports should be opened on the server. We should have a cli option to "gluster" command which would check and print the necessary ports that needs to be opened. Raising as an RFE to have this triage d.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glusterfs-3.3.0beta4-1.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2012-05-19 06:12:42 UTC

Doesn't 'gluster volume status' suffice this requirement?

Comment 2 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-06-01 20:45:46 UTC

<snip>
19-05-2012 02:50:40 > shanks: jdarcy, think we should have a cli option to check which ports should be opened ? would it be a valid RFE ?

19-05-2012 02:51:12 < jdarcy!quassel@nat/redhat/x-hcbczmrkxevlbjbm: shanks: That sounds like a really useful thing to have, so yeah, it'd be totally valid.\

19-05-2012 02:51:48 > shanks: jdarcy, great! raising one. 
</snip>

But yes, 'gluster volume status' does seem to suffice this requirement.

Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2012-06-04 13:40:29 UTC

Closing this as 'volume status' addresses this requirement.