Bug 823466
Summary: | Request for EPEL branch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Huffman <bloch> |
Component: | ipsec-tools | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | tmraz |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-05-21 11:25:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adam Huffman
2012-05-21 10:23:32 UTC
We cannot do a simple EPEL branch for ipsec-tools as it would conflict with the RHEL ipsec-tools package. And I am not interested in making a special non-conflicting version of it. But feel free to do such package - it would have to be renamed (that means a new package review) and also the files in the rpm package would have to be renamed to remove the conflict. (In reply to comment #1) > We cannot do a simple EPEL branch for ipsec-tools as it would conflict with > the RHEL ipsec-tools package. And I am not interested in making a special > non-conflicting version of it. But feel free to do such package - it would > have to be renamed (that means a new package review) and also the files in > the rpm package would have to be renamed to remove the conflict. Sorry, I should have been more specific. It's EPEL6 I'm concerned about, because there's no equivalent RHEL package there. Again, if you don't wish to maintain it yourself, I'd be happy to do it. Fine, then please ask for creating the EPEL6 branch - the merge review where you can do that is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225905 |