Bug 827709

Summary:	Review Request: levien-century-catalogue-fonts - century style font
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	abdulkarimmemon
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	abdulkarimmemon, metherid, notting, package-review, panemade, paul
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	AwaitingSubmitter
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-03-04 04:22:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description abdulkarimmemon 2012-06-02 15:07:42 UTC

Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/techmaniack/levien-century-catalogue-fonts/master/levien-century-catalogue-fonts.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/techmaniack/levien-century-catalogue-fonts/raw/master/levien-century-catalogue-fonts-1.001-1.fc16.src.rpm

Hey! I'm new to packaging rpms and have just finished packaging this century style font after building the traditional GNU Hello package and i would appreciate a review so that i can get into Fedora.
Description: 
This font is currently the closest to release, with a decent glyph complement. It's a straightforward revival  of a somewhat forgotten, but handsome and utilitarian, font from the ATF collection. It's obviously very similar to the familiar Century Oldstyle, but with more refined proportions and stroke. This version is based on the 18pt from the 1923 catalog.

Fedora Account System Username:
techmaniack

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-04 11:59:13 UTC

I can sponsor you provided you will review other package submission and/or will add few more package reviews. When you will do any informal package review, please add that review bug number in this bugzilla. This will let me know that you are doing some reviews.

also please read the process of getting sponsored in packager group at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

Look for new packages at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-04 13:15:44 UTC

you may also find following links interested to read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-12 13:22:06 UTC

Hi techmaniack,
   Can you do some (say 3) informal package reviews in detail that will show that you get familiar with packaging guidelines?

Some people have given package review template that you can use while reviewing packages. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Review_Template and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template

Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-29 14:21:32 UTC

any update here?

Comment 5 abdulkarimmemon 2012-07-06 17:12:43 UTC

Hey Parag,
 I was a bit involved in other stuff so couldn't do the reviews as you said.
I'll definitely try and give it a shot sometime next week.

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2013-02-05 13:04:09 UTC

We had enough waiting here. If reporter will not report in next 15 days with any updates, let's close this review.