Bug 827722
Summary: | Review Request: python-qrcode - Python QR Code image generator | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | icon, lemenkov, notting, package-review, pingou, rbean |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | lemenkov:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-19 14:50:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 827723 |
Description
Michel Lind
2012-06-02 16:30:07 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 824628 *** *** Bug 824628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/healthcare/python-qrcode.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/healthcare/python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc17.src.rpm Incorporated Pierre-Yves' feedback both in #824628 and in the development list I'll review it. Koji scratchbuild for F-18: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4135361 REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is almost silent work ~: rpmlint Desktop/python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc18.* python-qrcode.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qrcode 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. work ~: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD as stated in the PKG-INFO file). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum qrcode-2.4.1.tar.gz* 3b7613c4bff6d4a381ab9641d384a9dd7dc48e133dc29b5f85c45e429f6713ef qrcode-2.4.1.tar.gz 3b7613c4bff6d4a381ab9641d384a9dd7dc48e133dc29b5f85c45e429f6713ef qrcode-2.4.1.tar.gz.1 sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. +/- The package should consistently use macros so please use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT although I personally don't consider this as a blocker. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please consider consistent macro usage within spec-file before importing. This package is APPROVED. (In reply to comment #5) > Please consider consistent macro usage within spec-file before importing. Hmm, my interpretation of that directive is that as long as one doesn't mix and match $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in the same spec one is OK (though I've been leaning towards using %{buildroot} anyway so I'll change that in any case). Otherwise every default template generated by rpmdev-newspec is broken! > This package is > > APPROVED. Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-qrcode Short Description: Python QR Code image generator Owners: salimma Branches: el6 f16 f17 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc17 python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc16 python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.el6 python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. python-qrcode-2.4.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-qrcode New Branches: epel7 Owners: ralph InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). |