Bug 82842
Summary: | NDBM_File module missing from perl (and there's no separate perl-NDBM_File) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Matthew Miller <mattdm> |
Component: | perl | Assignee: | Chip Turner <cturner> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | ali |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-05-26 22:08:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthew Miller
2003-01-27 16:59:33 UTC
It's been gone for longer than the beta cycle. It isn't in 8.0 AFAIK. At first glance I thought this was a bad idea but upon digging I've noticed most semi-modern projects dropped NDBM use ~anyway~. What production impact do you see from this? I do find it odd that something in the standard Perl tree would be removed like that (but I bet there are other examples)... but I don't see a real serious impact to most customers. In my shop we use ActiveState Perl anyhow so we can standardize across out platforms. I'm curious as to what you've encountered wishing for NDBM? Cheers, -Ali One of my coworkers asked about it. I figure no one cares about this by now. Closing out. |