Bug 82928
| Summary: | dual cosole output | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci> |
| Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3 | CC: | kambiz, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-04-22 15:41:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Matthew Galgoci
2003-01-28 15:59:34 UTC
A little elaboration on this... the kernel output is sent to both, but the processes following init only send their output to the last entered "console=" arg of the kernel. It would be nice if they wrote to both. Kambiz The kernel will happily do dual console output, so I think this is more of an init problem. Init seems to only output to the last console specified on the command line. It would be swell if it could support tty0 and a serial port. :) A proper kernel boot argument list and a clever use of tee (needs to be copied to /bin/tee) will produce the desired behavior. Only noteworthy restriction is that the console capable of input before any gettys are running will be limited to one or the other console based on the order they are specified on the command line. Still a problem with current distros ? Closing, no response. Can you provide the required changed to the init scripts in order for init output to go to all consoles specified as arguments to the kernel on boot? Kambiz I don't think this is possible as it currently stands in init. Well... in that case, feel free to just close this. It's not a critical thing ... I just didn't know if it was something we could easily accomodate. Otherwise, perhaps consider this as a request for enhancement. Kambiz |