Bug 829971

Summary: Review Request: samplv1 -A polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: lemenkov, northlomax, notting, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lemenkov: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-14 00:49:22 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 805236    

Description Brendan Jones 2012-06-07 22:21:40 UTC
samplv1 is a polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx using the Qt toolkit. This package provides both a stand alone application and an LV2 plugin.

SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1.spec

rpmlint /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.src.rpm /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.x86_64.rpm /home/bsjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lv2-samplv1-0.0.1-0.1.svn671.fc17.x86_64.rpm
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samplv1_jack
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synth -> synthesis
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

Comment 1 Jørn Lomax 2012-06-15 00:45:12 UTC
You might want to check the URL and the source URL

Comment 2 Brendan Jones 2012-06-15 01:42:39 UTC
Thanks. Updated the URL. Source0 is OK.

SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1-0.0.1-0.2.svn671.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/samplv1.spec

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2012-07-16 07:49:59 UTC
I'll review it

Comment 4 Peter Lemenkov 2012-07-16 08:06:58 UTC
Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide:

* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4242898

REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint emits only non-critical/easyfix/bogus warnings:

work ~/Desktop: rpmlint lv2-samplv1-0.0.1-0.2.svn671.fc18.x86_64.rpm samplv1-*
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synth -> synthesis
lv2-samplv1.x86_64: W: no-documentation
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/samplv1-svn671.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found

^^^ please this this. Proper link is

http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/old/samplv1-svn671.tar.gz

Note "old/" as a part of the link. Also new version is available:

http://www.rncbc.org/snapshots/samplv1-0.0.8svn759.tar.gz

samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fx -> f, x, fix
samplv1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samplv1_jack
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
work ~/Desktop: 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2 or later, as stated in the source files).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.

+/- The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source. Please take a look at my note regarding wrong link.

sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum samplv1-svn671.tar.gz*
6177006a34c7ef1ba456f71d95dd6f47c55f4a6b044b01845082e4915b9ee3be  samplv1-svn671.tar.gz
6177006a34c7ef1ba456f71d95dd6f47c55f4a6b044b01845082e4915b9ee3be  samplv1-svn671.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 


+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
0 The package DOESN'T have a %clean section, so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
0 No C/C++ header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files without a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so) in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 The package doesn't include a %{name}.desktop file.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
0 At the beginning of %install, the package  does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


Please, fix Source0 link before importing. This package is

APPROVED.

Comment 5 Brendan Jones 2012-07-17 15:13:50 UTC
Thanks for the review! Upstream have released a newer version, thus the source error.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: samplv1
Short Description: polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
Owners: bsjones
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-07-18 03:18:51 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-07-26 05:01:45 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-07-26 22:29:24 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-08-14 00:49:22 UTC
samplv1-0.0.8-0.1.svn759.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.